Security - Self Hosting vs. Hosting Provider

When deciding how to deploy audad organizations face a critical choice: self-hosting within their own infrastructure or leveraging a trusted hosting provider. This decision significantly impacts security posture, operational overhead, compliance capabilities, and overall system resilience. Both approaches offer distinct advantages and trade-offs that must be carefully evaluated against organizational needs, resources, and risk tolerance. The following comparison provides a comprehensive analysis of key aspects to help inform your deployment strategy and ensure your security operations platform aligns with your organizational requirements.

Advantages and Considerations

Aspect Self-Hosting Trusted Hosting Provider
Pros Enhanced privacy with data never leaving your internal network
Full control and customization
Reduced external threat vectors
Alignment with specific internal policies
In-house management of backups and recovery
Scalability and resilience with automated backups and multi-region redundancy
Built-in protections and certifications matching standards like ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA
Easier integration with other cloud services
• Proactive anomaly detection and real-time monitoring
Cons Requires internal IT resources for setup, maintenance, monitoring, and patching
Potential for higher upfront costs and operational overhead
Less inherent scalability without additional internal investment
Dependence on third-party provider, which may introduce risks if the provider experiences issues
Potential ongoing subscription or hosting costs
Slightly reduced direct control compared to on-premises setups, though mitigated by custom configurations

Technical and Operational Capabilities

Capability Self-Hosting Trusted Hosting Provider
Data Control and Sovereignty Provides complete control over sensitive data with full data sovereignty, eliminating reliance on third-party providers. Data is kept within the internal network. Leverages certified data centers from reputable providers, offering enterprise-grade features like end-to-end encryption, but involves reliance on the provider for data management.
Security Framework Robust internal security with integration into existing measures like custom encryption, firewalls, and zero-trust architectures. Isolates the platform from public internet vulnerabilities, minimizing risks like DDoS or phishing. Strong security through provider features such as end-to-end encryption, secure identity management, DDoS mitigation, and web application firewalls. Supports deployment in VPNs or isolated subnets for restricted access.
Integration and Flexibility High flexibility to align with organizational security policies, including custom logging, audit trails, and integration with intrusion detection systems. Versatile deployment options (e.g., AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, VPS, dedicated servers) with customizable security policies and seamless workflow integration.
Access Controls Stringent controls like VPNs, multi-factor authentication, and role-based permissions, enforced in-house. Configurable controls supporting multi-factor authentication and role-based permissions, managed via the provider.
Monitoring and Response Real-time monitoring, rapid in-house patch deployment, and dynamic dashboards for swift audit responses. Comprehensive audit logging, real-time monitoring for anomaly detection, and proactive threat response within a fortified infrastructure.
Scalability and Resilience Relies on internal infrastructure for scaling; enables rapid recovery through isolated setups, but may require manual expansion. Ensures high availability with automated backups, multi-region redundancy, and optimized resource allocation to minimize downtime.
Compliance Alignment Tailored to regulatory requirements with proactive risk management and detailed audit trails in a controlled environment. Simplifies adherence through provider certifications.

Stay in the Loop

Just drop us a line and we'll be in touch to update you on the latest developments and availability.